An expensive failure admitted, at long last.
Most people like CCTV cameras. They show Something - as in Something Must Be Done - is being done. And most people don't care about enjoying the freedom to walk down the street without being spied on by a camera. Because they don't care, they don't think I should get to enjoy that freedom either.
The government's proposed solution - obviously - is to say that we need next generation digital cameras, more expensive, more extensive. When something isn't working, the government tells people how much it costs as if the expenditure of money were its own reward. And if police, understandably, can't be bothered to sift through hours of footage to spot something, moving to high resolution playback with surround sound isn't going to up the numbers very far. Popcorn sellers - get back in your seats.
I would be delighted if a major political party pledged no new cameras and instead spent our precious money on those things which prevent and punish crime. Perhaps Boris? Could the man who last year proposed giving Iran nukes be the voice of sanity?
No chance. Mayor Johnson wants to put CCTV on buses at a cost he claims will be £3000 per bus. Images will be beamed to a control room where, we assume, people will sit and watch what is happening on buses. Exciting and cheap, no?
Why not just put everyone in a taxi and watch Trisha?
Tuesday, 6 May 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Foot patrols? Did somebody say foot patrols?
You did David. No one else.
I loved this observation: "When something isn't working, the government tells people how much it costs as if the expenditure of money were its own reward"
I've thought this for a while. A typical exchange:
Cameron (for it is he): Why is education / health / transport / whatever so rubbish?
Brown: We are the party that has spent £500 gazillion on it - which his party opposed! [cue sycophantic cheers]
The logical follow up - it seems to me - is to point out that in that case, it's even *worse* that the service in question is so poor. Had the government spent no money on it (sorry, "invested") then it might be more excusable.
Well, Cameron isn't going to do anything differently. Not a thing.
Of course, it's all academic to Jon, as to Cameron. Why can't these people just hire private security guards like everybody else?
Perhaps because they thought that they had hired security when they paid taxes for the Police to patrol the streets.
Vote Davis.
hi mate, this is the canadin pharmacy you asked me about: the link
I love those Canadin pharmacies. Like the Canadian ones, but even cheaper.
Neill - write something new!
Post a Comment